A peer-reviewed, evidence-based journal that promotes clinical development and metabolic insights in total bariatric patient care for the healthcare professional
Issue link: http://bariatrictimes.epubxp.com/i/800348
22 The Medical Student Notebook Bariatric Times • March 2017 67. Rasmussen M. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure with indomethacin: friend or foe? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49:341. 68. Huna-Baron R, Kupersmith MJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy. J Neurol. 2002; 249:1078. 69. Evans RW, Friedman DI. Expert opinion: the management of pseudotumor cerebri during pregnancy. Headache. 2000; 40:495. 70. Fonseca PL, Rigamonti D, Miller NR, Subramanian PS. Visual outcomes of surgical intervention for pseudotumour cerebri: optic nerve sheath fenestration versus cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:1360. 71. Feldon SE. Visual outcomes comparing surgical techniques for management of severe idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 23:E6. 72. Eggenberger ER, Miller NR, Vitale S. Lumboperitoneal shunt for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology. 1996; 46:1524. 73. Johnston I, Besser M, Morgan MK. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the treatment of benign intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1988; 69:195. 74. Chumas PD, Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunting: a retrospective study in the pediatric population. Neurosurgery. 1993; 32:376. 75. Rosenberg ML, Corbett JJ, Smith C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures in pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology. 1993; 43:1071. 76. McGirt MJ, Woodworth G, Thomas G, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement for pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache: predictors of treatment response and an analysis of long- term outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101:627. 77. Sell JJ, Rupp FW, Orrison WW Jr. Iatrogenically induced intracranial hypotension syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165:1513. 78. Banta JT, Farris BK. Pseudotumor cerebri and optic nerve sheath decompression. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:1907. 79. Nelson DW, Blair KS, Martin MJ. Analysis of obesity-related outcomes and bariatric failure rates with the duodenal switch vs gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147:847. 80. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254:410. 81. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight- loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:859. 82. van Rutte PW, Smulders JF, de Zoete JP, Nienhuijs SW. Outcome of sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure. Br J Surg. 2014; 101:661. 83. O'Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013; 257:87. 84. Manfield JH, Yu KK, Efthimiou E, et al. Bariatric surgery or non- surgical weight loss for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A systematic review and comparison of meta-analyses. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):513–521. 85. Sugerman HJ, Felton WL, Salvant JB, et al. Effects of surgically induced weight loss on idiopathic intracranial hypertension in morbid obesity. Neurology. 1995;45(9):1655–1659. 86. Whiteley W, Al-Shahi R, Warlow CP, et al. CSF opening pressure: reference interval and the effect of body mass index. Neurology. 2006; 67:1690. 87. Egan RJ, Meredith HE, Coulston JE, et al. The effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):161–166. 88. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non- surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:5934. 89. Handley JD, Baruah BP, Williams DM et al. Bariatric surgery as a treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(6):1396–1403. FUNDING: No funding was provided. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: The author reports no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article. A DDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Leith Hathout, E-mail: Leith_Hathout@hms.harvard.edu IS YOUR BARIATRIC CENTER ACCREDITED? UNIQUE? DO YOU HAVE A UNIQUE CASE TO SHARE? BARIATRIC TIMES IS SEEKING SUBMISSIONS! Contact Angela Saba at firstname.lastname@example.org for information on how to be featured in an upcoming installment of the Bariatric Center Spotlight or to submit your Case Report today. ALSO ACCEPTING VIDEO CLIPS WITH SUBMISSIONS. If accepted, your video clip could be included in the Bariatric Times digital edition.